Subject:
|
Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.org.ca.nalug
|
Date:
|
Tue, 16 Jan 2001 23:40:53 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2700 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.org.ca.nalug, Chris Gray writes:
> "James Brown" <galliard@shades-of-night.com> writes:
>
> > I ran across another problem if we have an 'open C' style of layout - we need
> > another bridge. The loop containing your arch can't come back around if our
> > layout is open behind.
>
> That's where the four tracks come from. The way Steve drew it the other
> night, the main loop crossed over itself on the bridge, which of course
> implies that it can't be "water" under the bridge.
Hmm. I musta been out of the room at the time... If we're dispensing with
the idea of the bridge going over anything, why not just run 3 continuous
loops? (or in the case of an 'open C', 2 loops?)
James
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Bridges
|
| (...) Quite right - I've got it "covered". ;-) (...) I think you were actually. :-) My original premise was that the bridge was crossing over the cross-over tracks in a larger scale update of my favorite train LEGO train cover photo from the 60's. (...) (23 years ago, 17-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: SuperTrain 2001 layout - Mountain
|
| (...) That's where the four tracks come from. The way Steve drew it the other night, the main loop crossed over itself on the bridge, which of course implies that it can't be "water" under the bridge. (23 years ago, 16-Jan-01, to lugnet.org.ca.nalug)
|
91 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
