To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 110
109  |  111
Subject: 
Re: Ldraw cannon
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Sun, 6 Dec 1998 18:35:52 GMT
Viewed: 
1562 times
  
Larry Pieniazek wrote
Performing a task has an economic value. That value is what getting the
task done is WORTH. Determining that value by analysis is tricky, but
factors that contribute include what the impact of not doing the task at
all would be with no process change, and what it would cost to change
process to avoid the need for the task, and what it would cost to
automate the task (just another sort of process change).

In deciding how to get a task performed, given its worth, an employer
can either get an existing employee to do it or hire a new one. Hiring
has a cost as well, and there are ongoing incremental costs associated
with one more employee, both reasonable (benefits, and uniforms and
suchlike) and unreasonable (the Social Security ponzi scheme, for
example), that must be borne.


One minor point Larry: this presumes that the employer will pay what
the job is worth, rather that the minimum required to attract staff.
I would object to that practice were I a shareholder.

The minimum wage is similar - there is no practical incentive for an
employer to pay workers enough to survive, let alone live well. All
the employer has to do is provide enough to attract suitably subsidised
workers. Like you as a child, or homeless people, or petty criminals.
The British have been through this, and I'm sure you've read enough
Dickens to know that it's not a lot of fun being there.

Moz



Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Ldraw cannon
 
<366A0E48.901D7C85@c...OSPAM.com> <F3J7pC.EGt@lugnet.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit (...) OK, briefly. This is purely an economic analysis. Anyone who wishes to prattle about how people have rights (...) (25 years ago, 6-Dec-98, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

94 Messages in This Thread:















































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR