Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek, lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 04:15:28 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@STOPSPAMMERSmattdm.org
|
Viewed:
|
70 times
|
| |
|
|
Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> wrote:
> Maybe "obsolescent" was the wrong term. I think I meant
> depreciated...but I'm not sure if that's right either.
Depreciated is what I think you meant, but I looked it up at the w3c, and
it's actually not.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
