Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 05:42:05 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
869 times
|
| |
|
|
Ben Gatrelle wrote in message ...
> In lugnet.admin.general, Todd Lehman writes:
>
> > Security through obscurity may be a weak form of security, but it's still
> > security (i.e., the intended limitation of viewing). In fact, any file on
> > any webserver that's not linked to from some normally-navigable public • page
> > on that webserver is a file which I would call "secured" in some way or
> > another. (Again, maybe security through obscurity, but if a file isn't
> > linked to, then clearly the intention is for it not to be seen.)
>
> What about <www.LEGO.com/topsecret> which when I found it last year had • pre-
> release pics of the original SW sets that were coming out. There was a
> refernce to this URL in a Mania Magazine (which published the URL) but • there
> was no link to this page from anywhere on any of the LEGO main screens,
> including the club screen, if memory server??
>
> According to Brad I could notpost to LUGNET saying, "check this out!"
That URL has been published and is clearly intended for public consumption.
Frank Filz
Posting from my Dad's
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) What about <www.LEGO.com/topsecret> which when I found it last year had pre- release pics of the original SW sets that were coming out. There was a refernce to this URL in a Mania Magazine (which published the URL) but there was no link to (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
