Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 01:26:21 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.org(StopSpammers)
|
Viewed:
|
761 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Schlickbernd <corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote:
> Does Netiquette = illegal or does Netiquette = polite? That's a question,
> not a challenge. Is the same information without being a clickable
> hyperlink okay? Mind you, I'm willing to go along with Lego's request based
> on politeness, regardless.
If Lego changes their statement to be: "Out of politeness, please don't
publish URLs not clickable through links on our pages", I would also be
inclined to respect that.
The "don't do this because it violates our legal rights" stuff is what has
me concerned. (See: rant about how this potentially breaks the WWW.)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Does Netiquette = illegal or does Netiquette = polite? That's a question, not a challenge. Is the same information without being a clickable hyperlink okay? Mind you, I'm willing to go along with Lego's request based on politeness, regardless. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
