Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 22:18:11 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
550 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Matthew Miller writes:
> Bruce Schlickbernd <corsair@schlickbernd.org> wrote:
> > I would agree with Mike's interpretation. Whether or not lawyers would, I
> > don't know. If Lego put this information on a billboard in the middle of
>
>
> They probably would agree. Read this story:
>
> <URL:http://www.nytimes.com/library/tech/99/12/cyber/cyberlaw/10law.html>
>
> Note that no decision has been reached, despite the preliminary injunction.
> Also note that this is actually about linking to documents which violate
> copyright, so linking to documents actually published by Lego doesn't even
> come close. The important point is that several intellectual property
> experts disagree with the preliminary injunction, even.
>
>
>
> --
> Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
> Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
Actually, my wife works (to her eternal torment) with two copyright/patent
attorneys. They are all out on vacation, thus the vagueness.
Ahhhh, no I'm not going to input anything - thanks for the link, but I'll pass.
Bruce
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) They probably would agree. Read this story: <URL:(URL) Note that no decision has been reached, despite the preliminary injunction. Also note that this is actually about linking to documents which violate copyright, so linking to documents (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
