Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 17:11:11 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.org%NoMoreSpam%
|
Viewed:
|
1126 times
|
| |
|
|
Jasper Janssen <jasper@janssen.dynip.com> wrote:
> The IMG tag was implemented first, and _then_ codified into RFC
> status. [snip]
Of course. _Most_ Internet standards work this way. The initial standards
documents are often descriptions of current in-use procedures. Or at least,
a synthesis of such.
But yeah, that doesn't mean they weren't shortsighted. :)
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Because Netscape designers and programmers of the first hour were utterly clueless. The IMG tag was implemented first, and _then_ codified into RFC status. There was at the same time another type of tag for embedding everything in the works at (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
