Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 22:36:01 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
687 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 17 Dec 1999 21:02:28 GMT, "Dave Schuler" <orrex@excite.com>
wrote:
> If a book is copyrighted, but the copyright doesn't expressly appear on each
> page and in each picture in the book, it's still infringement to re-publish
> information from those pages. How does this differ from the posting of links
> or re-publication of images taken from a site, even if those images don't have
> embedded copyright warnings?
It is the same as posting the images.
It has NOTHING AT ALL to do with posting links.
> I recognize that posting links, rather than actual images, is different, but
> I don't think the overarching answer is "if I can get at it, it's fair game."
Yes, it is. Anything on an unsecured webserver is being published.
That's what a webserver is FOR.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) I don't agree. (I see the point, but I don't think it's that simple.) What is security -- fundamentally? A file served from under the URL (URL) the /images/ directory is HTTP-password-protected with the username and password combo of (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Perhaps there's already a well-established law to address the following analogy, but I'm still wondering: If a book is copyrighted, but the copyright doesn't expressly appear on each page and in each picture in the book, it's still (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
