Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 06:19:18 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1240 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.admin.general, Mike Stanley writes:
> > I dunno about the net population at large, but I'd certainly experience
> > guilt feelings if I summoned up an image to which there was no readily-
> > obvious hyperlink, because I'd assume that the reason there was no link
> > was because I wasn't supposed to see it or find it. Then again, I'm not
> > someone who snoops in people's medicine cabinets either (not that anyone
> > here is).
>
> That's silly. Those two have absolutely nothing to do with each other.
What two?
> Brad even specifically mentioned something about "by accident or by
> intent". So you're telling me that if you accidentally mistype a
> character in a URL and end up seeing an image you can't find a
> hyperlink to you feel guilty? That's preposterous.
Heh heh...no, that's not what I meant by "summoned up"; I was referring to
snooping or URL trolling. If I summoned up an image by accident, I'd be
surprised more than anything else.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Bringing up a world-readable image on a publicly accessible webserver (by any means - either mistyping or experimenting with urls) and invading someone's privacy by going through their medicine cabinets. I don't think you were try to imply (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
