Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 02:37:20 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
mattdm@mattdm.org+saynotospam+
|
Viewed:
|
1072 times
|
| |
|
|
Todd Lehman <lehman@javanet.com> wrote:
> I thought we were talking about links to images.
There's a difference?
(I'm serious.)
Anyway, Brad Justus' statement is about "images or material".
> I think the fact that the images are *gone* now expresses an even stronger
> intent not to publish. :)
*shrug* Perhaps. The web site that was at <URL:http://quote.tln.net/> isn't
there any more. Doesn't mean I didn't mean to publish it. :)
> before they were taken down. But if URLs were gotten by guessing or poking
> and making up new ones and discovering things that aren't linked to, then
> that's gotta be different considering the intent-to-publish thing. (I mean
> ethically and respectfully, not legally and technically.)
I think I would seperate ethically from that as a third aspect. I can be
respectful without feeling an ethical obligation to do so.
Right now, I'm 100% concerned with the "legally and technically" issue. I
think that respectfully, if it's clear that Lego doesn't want such things
published (it wasn't) than they shouldn't be.
But, on the other hand, if they think that they have some sort of right for
me to not provide links to their images, I don't feel that's something that
people _should_ respect, because it leads to bad things.
--
Matthew Miller ---> mattdm@mattdm.org
Quotes 'R' Us ---> http://quotes-r-us.org/
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Brad's statement was, to wit, in response to a question by LarryP asking about links to images. (...) If you're willing to respect the wishes regardless of legality, then that makes the legality a moot issue. (I don't think anyone was (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) I thought we were talking about links to images. (...) I think the fact that the images are *gone* now expresses an even stronger intent not to publish. :) (...) But if a web developer at some company makes an idiotic mistake like that (and (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
