Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Fri, 17 Dec 1999 20:52:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
533 times
|
| |
|
|
Scott-A <scott-arthur@eh105jb.freeserve.co.uk> wrote:
> > Fairly reasonable. I don't particularly agree with the "if it's
> > there on the server for you to see if you mistype a number in a URL
> > but isn't specifically hyperlinked you can't 'publish' a link to it"
> > interpretation.
>
> I have to agree with you Mike. If Lego has sensative data on its server
> which the public has easy access to that is there problem... not mine.
> However, I don't want Todd to end up in jail for hosting data, or links to
> it.
The chances of Todd ending up in jail for virtually anything you or
I post here is practically nil, imo.
Hosting the data (set pictures, maybe even set names in advance of
their official release) could be a little iffy - I expect he'd axe
posts like that.
Hosting messages that contain links to other sites that are hosting
data? I don't think so, but I guess what matters most is what Todd
thinks.
--
The parts you want and nothing else?
http://jaba.dtrh.com/ - Just Another Brick Auction
Why pay eBay? Run your own LEGO auctions for free!
http://www.guarded-inn.com/bricks/
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| Mike Stanley wrote in message ... (...) I have to agree with you Mike. If Lego has sensative data on its server which the public has easy access to that is there problem... not mine. However, I don't want Todd to end up in jail for hosting data, or (...) (25 years ago, 17-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
