Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.geek
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 15:04:29 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1089 times
|
| |
|
|
On Sat, 18 Dec 1999 03:47:44 GMT, mattdm@mattdm.org (Matthew Miller)
wrote:
> PS: why does HTML just have the IMG tag? Why not have the EMBED tag let you
> _embed anything_ arbitrarily? Like, another HTML document?
Because Netscape designers and programmers of the first hour were
utterly clueless.
The IMG tag was implemented first, and _then_ codified into RFC
status. There was at the same time another type of tag for embedding
everything in the works at RFC headquarters. <a embed="bla"></a>,
IIRC.
Jasper
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Of course. _Most_ Internet standards work this way. The initial standards documents are often descriptions of current in-use procedures. Or at least, a synthesis of such. But yeah, that doesn't mean they weren't shortsighted. :) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.off-topic.geek)
|
Message is in Reply To:
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
