Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.admin.general
|
Date:
|
Sat, 18 Dec 1999 05:53:15 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
917 times
|
| |
|
|
Bruce Schlickbernd wrote in message ...
> It seems more to me that Lego made a mistake. Being a reasonable person • and
> liking Lego, I'm willing to respect their wishes and have deleted the scans
> from my computer nor will I make it available to others.
Now here, we're talking about a different issue. I read the above as that
you copied the images. If so, deleting them, and not sharing them is NOT
just "being a nice guy", it is obeying the copyright law.
I agree that publishing a URL to something unpublished is not clearly
"illegal", however, we have been asked by TLC to not share these. In this
respect, if Todd wants his server to respect TLC's wishes, I think we need
to honor that. I think it does mean that Todd needs to at least clarify the
T&C.
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) With regard to the issues at hand, I would prefer it if everyone respected Brad's and therefore TLC's wishes, regardless of legality. In other words, out of courtesy and respect for the company whose products we love and are here to have fun (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Does Netiquette = illegal or does Netiquette = polite? That's a question, not a challenge. Is the same information without being a clickable hyperlink okay? Mind you, I'm willing to go along with Lego's request based on politeness, regardless. (...) (25 years ago, 18-Dec-99, to lugnet.admin.general)
|
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
