| |
Tom Stangl, VFAQman wrote:
>
> Larry Pieniazek wrote:
>
> > And I look forward to a redesigned website(1) and reeducation for
> > webjocks who stage in public. :-)
> >
> > 1 - no more shockwave, frames, graphics where text would do, and other
> > "kewl" stuff, one can hope! :-)
>
> Frames are EXTREMELY useful....when done RIGHT.
No, they are not. One cannot give a URL to take a person directly, one
has to quote navigation path. That's bogus.
Followups to .publish, this is a pet peeve of mine that I have expounded
on there before.
>
> --
> Tom Stangl
> ***http://www.vfaq.com/
> ***DSM Visual FAQ home
> ***http://ba.dsm.org/
> ***SF Bay Area DSMs
--
Larry Pieniazek larryp@novera.com http://my.voyager.net/lar
- - - Web Application Integration! http://www.novera.com
fund Lugnet(tm): http://www.ebates.com/ ref: lar, 1/2 $$ to lugnet.
NOTE: Soon to be lpieniazek@tsisoft.com :-)
|
|
Message has 3 Replies:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) I have to agree wholeheartedly with Tom. When done right -- and it's rare -- the benefits of frames do outweigh the drawbacks, IMO. Check out Joshua Delahunty's review archive if you've never seen a site that does frames right. Joshua gives (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
| | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) Arguably, that's a flaw in the implementation, not the concept of frames themselves. There should be some way to reference a given set of framed documents using a single URL. Hmmm; actually, that could be done with cgi. So arguably, that's (...) (25 years ago, 19-Dec-99, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
