Subject:
|
Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.publish
|
Date:
|
Sun, 19 Dec 1999 16:50:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
807 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.dear-lego, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> Tom Stangl, VFAQman wrote:
> > Frames are EXTREMELY useful....when done RIGHT.
>
> No, they are not. One cannot give a URL to take a person directly, one
> has to quote navigation path. That's bogus.
I have to agree wholeheartedly with Tom. When done right -- and it's rare --
the benefits of frames do outweigh the drawbacks, IMO.
Check out Joshua Delahunty's review archive if you've never seen a site that
does frames right. Joshua gives the person browsing the opportunity to see
the pages both ways -- framed and unframed. It's the best of both worlds,
with no negatives that I can see.
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Policy clarification regarding catalogs
|
| (...) To tell you the truth, I don't see the value added. Whenever you view a review, the top frame changes to reflect the set. This means there are no problems with URLs pointing to the main page, but it also means that for every review you read, (...) (25 years ago, 4-Jan-00, to lugnet.publish)
|
Message is in Reply To:
9 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
