| |
jasper@janssen.dynip.com (Jasper Janssen) writes:
> Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> wrote:
> > Actually, I believe the IMG tag is obsolescent.
>
> Too many things validate as approximately HTML/4.0 compliant for that
> to be true.
Maybe "obsolescent" was the wrong term. I think I meant
depreciated...but I'm not sure if that's right either.
> Besides, IMG is way too firmly entrenched. I don't think we'll ever
> root it out, unless we can provide a superior alternative (human
> nature being what it is, a _far_ superior alternative).
I agree. I still use IMG because it's easy and it works on almost all
browsers. However, I believe that I read that you are supposed to use
OBJECT tags for images in HTML 4.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
___________________________________________________________________
Why pay more to get Web access?
Try Juno for FREE -- then it's just $9.95/month if you act NOW!
Get your free software today: http://dl.www.juno.com/dynoget/tagj.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
93 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
