Subject:
|
Re: jumping to conclusions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Mon, 22 Apr 2002 16:41:44 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1453 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
<snip>
>
> You say so. Hatred exists because of intolerance. This whole thing started
> because the Arabs couldn't tolerate a Jewish state.
<snip>
> You idiot. We will *never* stop supporting Israel. *Their* allegiance could be
> argued to be more valuable than yours (England).
<snip>
> -John
I just thought that those two lines should be viewed together.
No reason...
Just because the atrocity is sanctioned by the government, it doesn't make
the atrocity right. To me it doesn't matter who started the war, now, over
50 years later--if *both* sides of the war are committing heinous 'war
crimes' that's just what they are, heinous crimes against humanity.
The axiom 'hatred exists because of intolerance' is absolute truth. And it
won't be until both sides stop hating each other that there will be real
resolution. Telling the PLO that they have to cease their 'holy war'
because they started this mess is like telling the Americans to go back to
Europe 'cause the natives were here first. It's history. Get over it.
What do we do now to solve the situation now so that there is no more
killing now (and hopefully into the future).
Both parties are to blame. Both parties must stop the violence. Both
parties must stop the hatred.
And we must stop sending money to the people who sanction *any* form of
terrorism.
Anyway, my two cents.
p.s. you know my stance on attacking the issue and not the person... 'nuff
said.
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
| (...) No reason? I think you definitely had a reason. But if it is to imply that I hate Scott, you're wrong. I disagree with him, and I called him an idiot because what he proposed was idiocy-- that's all. (...) Which "heinous war crimes" is Israel (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
| (...) D A N G E R ! Big mistake Dave. You are being objective. This is nothing but evidence of: a) Your bias. b) Your support for "PLO terrorists". c) The power of the international anti-Israeli media conspiracy. In the future, try to view this as a (...) (22 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
| (...) I think I clarified that. I said that if they *support* terrorists, they are as *culpable* as terrorists. Since the PLO represents them, they are in the unfortunate position of supporting terrorism. They are being woefully misled. Or (...) (...) (22 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
