To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16262
16261  |  16263
Subject: 
Re: jumping to conclusions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Mon, 29 Apr 2002 16:55:43 GMT
Viewed: 
3808 times
  
> > I think this is a very important point, which I would like to see more
> > focus on.  It is a sad fact that occupied people tend to use violent
> > and immoral action against the occupiying force.  It should also be
> > noted that such actions, which can be often be described as terrorism,
> > are commonly supported by the occupied people.  The history of
> > occupied Europe througout WWII should have teached us this.
> 
> I use the term "terrorism" as the specific, random targeting of civilians for
> the purpose of terrorizing them.  Notice I don't even mention intent other than
> to terrorize.  There is no rationality behind terrorism beyond terrorizing.  It
> is irrational.

Let's just stick to the normal usage/definition of words... not your
distorted definition. I think this is pretty good:

"Terrorism is the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or
property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or
any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives." (FBI)


Scott A



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) What part of my definition would you consider a distortion? But even with the definition you supplied, I wouldn't call the example Fredrik provided "terrorism". -John I think this is pretty good: (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) I use the term "terrorism" as the specific, random targeting of civilians for the purpose of terrorizing them. Notice I don't even mention intent other than to terrorize. There is no rationality behind terrorism beyond terrorizing. It is (...) (25 years ago, 29-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

88 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR