Subject:
|
Re: jumping to conclusions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Apr 2002 23:10:39 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1687 times
|
| |
| |
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> > I was referring to PLO *terrorists*.
>
> So, if it is only the PLO terrorists who are uncivilised troublemakers, why
> are you anti-Palestinian?
<typing slowly so you will finally get it> The Palestinians *support* the PLO
and all of their terrorist activity. The PLO murders *on behalf* of the
Palestinians, *with their blessing*. *That* is why I am against them. Let them
renounce the PLO and terrorism and I will change my tune. But I don't ever see
that happening, especially when people around the world such as yourself believe
that terrorism in this case is somehow justified.
> >
> > > 2) Israel is a peace loving nation.
> >
> > Never said that. What would Israel know of peace?? She has
> > never been allowed to exist in peace!
>
>
> Lets just question this.
<snip yet another isolated incident that occured decades ago that is by and
large irrelevant>
> > > 3) There is an international anti-Israeli media conspiracy which distorts
> > > reality.
> >
> > I never said that, either. I said there is a liberal bias in the media, which
> > tends to sympathize with the Palestinians.
>
> Proof please?
There have been *books* written on the subject. It is common knowledge. If you
can't see it, you are either a part of it or brainwashed by it.
> > Answer me this, Scott:
> >
> > 1. Is terrorism ever justified?
>
> I have made my views known on this already in this very thread!
A simple yes or no. I asked because I'm not sure.
>
> >
> > 2. Was the attack on 9-11 justified?
>
> I have made my views known on this already Im rather offended you have
> even asked me this.
A simple yes or no. Why offense? Your responses throughout this whole
discussion make me wonder.
>
> > 3. What in your opinion *should* have been the US response?
<snip sarcastic drivel>
Typical. So quick to criticize, but yet if it were to have happened to you, you
have *no idea* how you would have responded. You probably think that it *
wouldn't* ever happen to you, because you wouldn't have ever put yourself in the
situation to have it happen to you. Arrogant, yet naive.
>
> What about you, do you know *WHY* 911 happened?
Look. If you are going to sit there and insinuate that somehow *we* are to
blame for 9-11, you are an idiot. The attacks on 9-11 occured because a group
of Arabs hated enough to deny their own humanity to murder innocents. IT HAS
NOTHING TO DO WITH US. I don't care what foreign policy you care to cite, IT
HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH US. It has *everything* to do with their own hatred and
intolerance. Period.
Do you care?
Of course I care! Because I don't want it to happen again.
Do you want
> justice or revenge?
Which do you think?
>
> > 5. Has the PLO ever promised peace?
>
> I expect it has.
Hmmm. Not so quick to look up peace treaties ever broken by the Palestinians...
I wonder why?
-John
|
|
Message has 3 Replies: | | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
| (...) I think the point Scott is trying to make is that not *all Palestinians* support the PLO, just as not all Americans support Dubya. Therefore, saying that you are against Palestinians (implying *all*) because they support the PLO is not a (...) (23 years ago, 27-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
| Can I assume that you wholly agree with the text you have deleted? (...) You said never. I proved you wrong. There appears to be a lot of these isolated incidents? How many does it take to prove Israeli belligerence to you? (...) Which books? (...) (23 years ago, 27-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
| (...) So, if it is only the PLO terrorists who are uncivilised troublemakers, why are you anti-Palestinian? (...) Lets just question this. Why did Meir (and her cabinet) turn down a cease-fire offer from Nasser (made via the USA?) on 7th Feb 1970? (...) (23 years ago, 26-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|