Subject:
|
Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 19:44:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1287 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:
> Am *I* comfortable with it? Not at all. As stated, I didn't appreciate a
> red stripe on a black canvas. That was just a stripe! There is a bigger
> picture, and I think the history of my posts have said again and again--I
> have the freedom to do whatever I want as long as it does not infringe on
> someone else's freedoms--'Swinging my arms as long as they don't connect
> with your nose'. That's 'big picture'.
Warning! Dave Koudys is espousing Libertarian rhetoric in the above :-)
> So let's get into how this Dave
> Axiom relates to the way I look at life.
>
> If a person got 2 kids in his/her apartment, stripped them naked and took
> sexually suggestive pictures of them, that is infringing on the kids
> freedom. I would definitly say that some 'nose punching' occured. Arrests
> should occur.
> If someone makes a crude drawing/computer animation/cow paddie/tuna fish
> sculpture depicting sexual content amongst kids, he has that right. That's
> what freedom is. I also have the freedom to *not* buy said 'art'. If the
> person in question used real live kids for inspiration, then again, freedom
> was curtailed and arrests should be made. But if it was from his own
> imagination, what can you arrest him on. Thoughts are not arrestable
> actions. Actions are arrestable actions. If we start arresting people for
> thoughts, then, as a Christian, you know we all 'fall short' and would all
> be in jail.
Just as a note, the US Supreme Court ruled on this very topic this week and
for once, by 5 to 4, got it right. (they ruled that depictions of acts by
adults in a way that made them appear to be being carried out by children
were not child pornography, per se.)
I still wanna know what a cow paddie is, though. I know what rice paddies
are, and cow patties too, but cow paddies are a new one on me. :-)
|
|
Message has 2 Replies:
 | | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| (...) Yeah, I thought he was from England;-) (...) Yes, leave it to the scum to circumvent law to appease their perversions. The slippery slope slants both ways. Our society will be hurt by this. -John (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
| | | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| (...) Will you give the poor guy a break for his typo already? He obviously meant to type "crow paddies," which equally obviously refer to rice farms that have an abundance of crows feeding on them. Duh! Dave! (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| (...) Am *I* comfortable with it? Not at all. As stated, I didn't appreciate a red stripe on a black canvas. That was just a stripe! There is a bigger picture, and I think the history of my posts have said again and again--I have the freedom to do (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
