Subject:
|
Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Thu, 18 Apr 2002 17:57:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1165 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek writes:
> but I would assert that there are at least two competing definitions of art:
>
> "art is in the eye of the beholder"
> "art is what the artist says is art"
I disagree only because I don't see these as competing views! In my view,
the artist is no more or less an observer than anyone else, when it comes to
viewing/judging/interpreting the work. To that end, "art is what the artist
says is art," but the artist is simply another beholder.
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Canceled Lego Theme...?
|
| (...) I certainly won't argue that point... at least not at this time. (...) but I would assert that there are at least two competing definitions of art: "art is in the eye of the beholder" "art is what the artist says is art" Under the first (...) (22 years ago, 18-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
