To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 16220
16219  |  16221
Subject: 
Re: jumping to conclusions
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 23 Apr 2002 15:44:44 GMT
Viewed: 
1469 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys writes:

To me it doesn't matter who started the war, now, over
50 years later--if *both* sides of the war are committing heinous 'war
crimes' that's just what they are, heinous crimes against humanity.

And this isn't a war.  It's
one country trying to defend itself against another group's attempt to
extinguish it.

Good point!  We should look with more sympathy on the actions of the
Palestinians given their plight.

Chris



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) Ha, nice try. But you are too clever by half. There *is* no country "Palestine". Why not? But thank you for the invitation, but I care not to sympathize with homicidal terrorists, no matter what their plight. Terrorism is *wrong* and *evil*, (...) (23 years ago, 23-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: jumping to conclusions
 
(...) No reason? I think you definitely had a reason. But if it is to imply that I hate Scott, you're wrong. I disagree with him, and I called him an idiot because what he proposed was idiocy-- that's all. (...) Which "heinous war crimes" is Israel (...) (23 years ago, 22-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

88 Messages in This Thread:
































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR