Subject:
|
Re: jumping to conclusions
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Fri, 19 Apr 2002 21:58:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1312 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Scott Arthur writes:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal writes:
> > The double standards is (sic) that BPS's work is seen as legitimate, while Dan's
> > is "in jest". Perhaps he *is* being serious. Why would you assume the former?
>
> That is why I said I *feel* Dan's intention was a jest. It is my
> *interpretation*. *Not* a statement of fact!
And is a jest any less legitimate than any other form of art?
ROSCO
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: jumping to conclusions
|
| (...) *sigh* (...) In 1953, a unit under command of Ariel Sharon, attacked the village of Qibya in Jordan 60+ were murdered. The day after the attack a UN observer said that the IDF had forced civilians to stay in their homes whilst they were (...) (22 years ago, 19-Apr-02, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
