To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4455
4454  |  4456
Subject: 
Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 07:10:25 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest*nospam*.net
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
7994 times
  
Mike Poindexter wrote:

> John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message
> news:38B70743.BC391655@uswest.net...
> > 
> > 
> > Jonathan Reynolds wrote:
> > 
> > > By the same token, An 8-wide tarin layout in the same area as a 6-wide • layout
> > > will (from a distance) look MORE toy-like simply because the trains will • have
> > > a shorter run before 'chasing their tails'. Or, put another way, if you • are
> > > into relistic operation you need to establish several depots/stations on • your
> > > layout from which to run trains & send them to. Using the larger (8 • wide)
> > > scale under the same space restrictions will limit the realism of the • inter-
> > > station distances and thus create a LESS REALISTIC OVERALL EFFECT.
> > 
> > Unless, of course, your layout is 22' long like the GMLTC's is (and • growing;)
> > 
> > 
> 
> I think that a more accurate measurement of size would be running feet of
> track along one trip around the loop.  A 22'x4' layout is smaller than a
> 22'x20'.  Even better measurement would be actual layout area, which could
> be measured in square feet or baseplate counts.
> 
> GMLTC layout is currently 16 modules, isn't it?  4 are 45"x45" and 12 are
> 45"x30".

Yes.  Here is a schematic:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=2213

> That is 108 large gray baseplates, or 168.75 square feet, which is
> easily long enough to handle an 8 wide train without chasing the tail.
> Remember, chasing the tail is based on length of the train and a heavier (8
> wide) train will overcome the magnets at a shorter overall length than a 6
> wide would.  Even so, it will have enough to make a fairly good length
> train.
> 
> Hey J.N. - Are you growing because you just have too many bricks over at
> Conan's and want to put more into modules or are you worried that within 16
> months it will be #2 in scope?

lol  Mike, I applaud your devotion-- all I can say is....GET HELP (building;)

> My garage will actually handle a 24 module
> layout, so that is what I am gunning for.  144 Large gray baseplates ~ 225
> sq. ft.  Once again, easily enough for some 8s.  If they don't convert to
> your size, you could always move out here.  ;-)  We really have to get our
> layouts together some time.

Absolutely we will have to:-)  J-1 and I have been discussing converting the
layout to 8 wide compatible this summer when Conan and his wife will be
traveling in Europe.  Eventually I think we will do it.

Don't know if I could leave God's country (MN;) but I would love to visit
sometime and work on a mod or two with you.  Would love to see any prelim
layout plans you have.

-John

> 
> 



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
 
Oh, did I just get psyched out. I checked you layout outline and the pointer turned into a finger, and I thought, "WOW, a map to the layout. Very nice." I clicked and got the layout outline again...d'Oh! Actually, it is nice to see the organization (...) (27 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
 
John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:38B70743.BC3916...est.net... (...) layout (...) have (...) are (...) your (...) wide) (...) inter- (...) growing;) (...) I think that a more accurate measurement of size would be running feet of (...) (27 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)  

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR