Subject:
|
Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 19 Feb 2000 02:19:13 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
1677 times
|
| |
|
|
> So, staying modular is a big bonus. It helps with the set-up and tear-down
> time. Some other factors are that as time goes by, and some of us move out of
> the area, or into the area, we can shift the layout without too much hassel.
> Also, as others in the area find us, we would want them to participate, and
> there-in lies the best reasons to keep us modular; we aren't gonna draw in too
> many new members if can't let them participate in the shows. The last thing
> is, that if you get tired of one structure in particular, you can change it
> out because you aren't tied to one thing.
I'm curious...have you regulated the requisite size per module (as per N-Trak)
if someone can come up with a set of guidelines regarding size, track
placement, and relative height of ground cover several people from very
different areas could combine modules at any given show or meeting...
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
| (...) too (...) This is true, but then you could look at our current layout, or look at the area of what we have been given for any particular show, and, actively pettition and negotiate for a certain position on the layout. (A negotiated (...) (25 years ago, 21-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
| (...) Well, I'm not the only voice of WAMALUG, but I can confirm that a lot of the lay-out was modular from many sources within the group. We tried real hard to keep a balance of differant types of items. We, (WAMALUG) are just lucky to have many (...) (25 years ago, 18-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
