To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4447
4446  |  4448
Subject: 
Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:50:45 GMT
Reply-To: 
johnneal@uswest.=nospam=net
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
3712 times
  
Jonathan Reynolds wrote:

In lugnet.trains, Mike Poindexter writes:


I see Lego as a toy that IS a model.  Sure, it is not scaled properly like a
highly detailed HO scale train set, but then again, those things are not
perfect, either.  They also have items that are not in proper scale and
details that were left off because they were too small.  Lego just doesn't
have the resolution.  Taken another way, take a photo and scan it in at 300
dpi in 16 bit color.  It is still a picture.  Scan it in at 36 dpi in 4 bit
color and it is still the same picture, but at a lower resolution.  You
can't say that it isn't a picture any more, or else a 2400 dpi true color
will come along and make your 300dpi scan a "non-picture."


By the same token, An 8-wide tarin layout in the same area as a 6-wide layout
will (from a distance) look MORE toy-like simply because the trains will have
a shorter run before 'chasing their tails'. Or, put another way, if you are
into relistic operation you need to establish several depots/stations on your
layout from which to run trains & send them to. Using the larger (8 wide)
scale under the same space restrictions will limit the realism of the inter-
station distances and thus create a LESS REALISTIC OVERALL EFFECT.

Unless, of course, your layout is 22' long like the GMLTC's is (and growing;)

Everything related to modelling trains involves the art of compromise. If you
spend time creating a more detailed train you compromise the time you have
available to play with/run it, if you spend time collecting as many orginal
mint/boxed Lego models as you can, then you compromise the time you have to be
more creative etc etc.

And, if you spend time rabbiting on on the internet you compromise the time
you have available to collect, build and run any trains at all!

Not true.  I rabbit sleep time;-)

-John



Jon



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
 
John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message news:38B70743.BC3916...est.net... (...) layout (...) have (...) are (...) your (...) wide) (...) inter- (...) growing;) (...) I think that a more accurate measurement of size would be running feet of (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
 
(...) By the same token, An 8-wide tarin layout in the same area as a 6-wide layout will (from a distance) look MORE toy-like simply because the trains will have a shorter run before 'chasing their tails'. Or, put another way, if you are into (...) (24 years ago, 25-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR