To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4409
4408  |  4410
Subject: 
Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Thu, 24 Feb 2000 13:57:53 GMT
Viewed: 
3557 times
  
I just purchased a few three foot high trees for my back yard. They cost
about $40. I guess I will have to return them to the nursery and say "Nope!
Nope! These trees are too small. I need trees that are at least 20 feet
tall. A guy on the Internet said trees that are as tall as me look too small
next to a train." Of course at that point they would send me home with my
little trees. ;-(

-Nick

(just a hint of sarcasm in there, no offense intended)

Ben Fleskes wrote in message ...
Your right, I'm against 8 wide and havn't built any 8 wide.  Why not?  Lots • of
reasons:

1) 8 wide demands larger scenery and buildings.  If your logic for building • 8
wide is because LEGO minifig trucks are 6 wide then you should make all • your
buildings and such that much larger.  Don't use any of the LEGO trees, they
would be too small.

<snip>



Message is in Reply To:
  Another 6wide/8wide ramble was: Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
 
Your right, I'm against 8 wide and havn't built any 8 wide. Why not? Lots of reasons: 1) 8 wide demands larger scenery and buildings. If your logic for building 8 wide is because LEGO minifig trucks are 6 wide then you should make all your buildings (...) (25 years ago, 24-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)  

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR