To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4458
4457  |  4459
Subject: 
Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 18:22:05 GMT
Reply-To: 
cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane+NoMoreSpam+.edu
Viewed: 
4334 times
  
Oh, did I just get psyched out. I checked you layout outline and the pointer
turned into a finger, and I thought, "WOW, a map to the layout. Very nice." I
clicked and got the layout outline again...d'Oh!

Actually, it is nice to see the organization of it even without the imagemap
part.

Chris

John Neal wrote:

Mike Poindexter wrote:

John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message
news:38B70743.BC391655@uswest.net...


Jonathan Reynolds wrote:

By the same token, An 8-wide tarin layout in the same area as a 6-wide • layout
will (from a distance) look MORE toy-like simply because the trains will • have
a shorter run before 'chasing their tails'. Or, put another way, if you • are
into relistic operation you need to establish several depots/stations on • your
layout from which to run trains & send them to. Using the larger (8 • wide)
scale under the same space restrictions will limit the realism of the • inter-
station distances and thus create a LESS REALISTIC OVERALL EFFECT.

Unless, of course, your layout is 22' long like the GMLTC's is (and • growing;)



I think that a more accurate measurement of size would be running feet of
track along one trip around the loop.  A 22'x4' layout is smaller than a
22'x20'.  Even better measurement would be actual layout area, which could
be measured in square feet or baseplate counts.

GMLTC layout is currently 16 modules, isn't it?  4 are 45"x45" and 12 are
45"x30".

Yes.  Here is a schematic:
http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=2213

That is 108 large gray baseplates, or 168.75 square feet, which is
easily long enough to handle an 8 wide train without chasing the tail.
Remember, chasing the tail is based on length of the train and a heavier (8
wide) train will overcome the magnets at a shorter overall length than a 6
wide would.  Even so, it will have enough to make a fairly good length
train.

Hey J.N. - Are you growing because you just have too many bricks over at
Conan's and want to put more into modules or are you worried that within 16
months it will be #2 in scope?

lol  Mike, I applaud your devotion-- all I can say is....GET HELP (building;)

My garage will actually handle a 24 module
layout, so that is what I am gunning for.  144 Large gray baseplates ~ 225
sq. ft.  Once again, easily enough for some 8s.  If they don't convert to
your size, you could always move out here.  ;-)  We really have to get our
layouts together some time.

Absolutely we will have to:-)  J-1 and I have been discussing converting the
layout to 8 wide compatible this summer when Conan and his wife will be
traveling in Europe.  Eventually I think we will do it.

Don't know if I could leave God's country (MN;) but I would love to visit
sometime and work on a mod or two with you.  Would love to see any prelim
layout plans you have.

-John






Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
 
(...) Yes. Here is a schematic: (URL) That is 108 large gray baseplates, or 168.75 square feet, which is (...) lol Mike, I applaud your devotion-- all I can say is....GET HELP (building;) (...) Absolutely we will have to:-) J-1 and I have been (...) (24 years ago, 26-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)  

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR