Subject:
|
Re: Toy vs Model...The real issue (was Re: Another 6wide/8wide ramble)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Sat, 26 Feb 2000 18:22:05 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
CMASI@CMASI.CHEM.spamcakeTULANE.EDU
|
Viewed:
|
4639 times
|
| |
|
|
Oh, did I just get psyched out. I checked you layout outline and the pointer
turned into a finger, and I thought, "WOW, a map to the layout. Very nice." I
clicked and got the layout outline again...d'Oh!
Actually, it is nice to see the organization of it even without the imagemap
part.
Chris
John Neal wrote:
> Mike Poindexter wrote:
>
> > John Neal <johnneal@uswest.net> wrote in message
> > news:38B70743.BC391655@uswest.net...
> > >
> > >
> > > Jonathan Reynolds wrote:
> > >
> > > > By the same token, An 8-wide tarin layout in the same area as a 6-wide • layout
> > > > will (from a distance) look MORE toy-like simply because the trains will • have
> > > > a shorter run before 'chasing their tails'. Or, put another way, if you • are
> > > > into relistic operation you need to establish several depots/stations on • your
> > > > layout from which to run trains & send them to. Using the larger (8 • wide)
> > > > scale under the same space restrictions will limit the realism of the • inter-
> > > > station distances and thus create a LESS REALISTIC OVERALL EFFECT.
> > >
> > > Unless, of course, your layout is 22' long like the GMLTC's is (and • growing;)
> > >
> > >
> >
> > I think that a more accurate measurement of size would be running feet of
> > track along one trip around the loop. A 22'x4' layout is smaller than a
> > 22'x20'. Even better measurement would be actual layout area, which could
> > be measured in square feet or baseplate counts.
> >
> > GMLTC layout is currently 16 modules, isn't it? 4 are 45"x45" and 12 are
> > 45"x30".
>
> Yes. Here is a schematic:
> http://www.brickshelf.com/cgi-bin/gallery.cgi?i=2213
>
> > That is 108 large gray baseplates, or 168.75 square feet, which is
> > easily long enough to handle an 8 wide train without chasing the tail.
> > Remember, chasing the tail is based on length of the train and a heavier (8
> > wide) train will overcome the magnets at a shorter overall length than a 6
> > wide would. Even so, it will have enough to make a fairly good length
> > train.
> >
> > Hey J.N. - Are you growing because you just have too many bricks over at
> > Conan's and want to put more into modules or are you worried that within 16
> > months it will be #2 in scope?
>
> lol Mike, I applaud your devotion-- all I can say is....GET HELP (building;)
>
> > My garage will actually handle a 24 module
> > layout, so that is what I am gunning for. 144 Large gray baseplates ~ 225
> > sq. ft. Once again, easily enough for some 8s. If they don't convert to
> > your size, you could always move out here. ;-) We really have to get our
> > layouts together some time.
>
> Absolutely we will have to:-) J-1 and I have been discussing converting the
> layout to 8 wide compatible this summer when Conan and his wife will be
> traveling in Europe. Eventually I think we will do it.
>
> Don't know if I could leave God's country (MN;) but I would love to visit
> sometime and work on a mod or two with you. Would love to see any prelim
> layout plans you have.
>
> -John
>
> >
> >
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
85 Messages in This Thread:
  
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
