Subject:
|
Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.trains
|
Date:
|
Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:58:07 GMT
|
Highlighted:
|
(details)
|
Viewed:
|
3136 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.trains, Mike Poindexter writes:
> Christopher Masi <cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu> wrote in message
> news:38B42AE5.D23FB900@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu...
> > Oh oh oh...another problem with 8 wide (main reason I am avoiding it):
> I personally feel that the biggest problem people have with 8 wide is
> converting all they have over. Well, we all complain that the new stuff
> sucks. If all you have is new stuff, then go 8 wide. You won't have 2 club
> cars looking at you trying to convince you to stay in kiddie land. If you
> have a lot of old stock, well, you might have a harder time upgrading, but
> the problem really lies within.
>
> Mike
I think Mike has gotten to the crux of the problem. All the issues brought up
are merely technical puzzles to solve. Personally, my investment in my 5
trains and assorted train items wouldn't hold me back from 8 wide.
Again, I think if TLC is interested in courting the AFOLs (and the train heads
in particular), they'll provide a reasonable upgrade option.
--Steve Martin
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
|
| Christopher Masi <cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu> wrote in message news:38B42AE5.D23FB9...ane.edu... (...) anyone recall (...) weight a lot (...) to hit the (...) both current (...) pushed (...) high enough (...) the technology (...) it another (...) (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
|
85 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
