To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.trainsOpen lugnet.trains in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Trains / 4371
4370  |  4372
Subject: 
Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.trains
Date: 
Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:46:03 GMT
Reply-To: 
CMASI@CMASI.CHEM.TULANE.stopspammersEDU
Highlighted: 
(details)
Viewed: 
3146 times
  
Oh oh oh...another problem with 8 wide (main reason I am avoiding it): anyone recall
how many engines John uses for his 8 wide stuff? Eight wide is going to weight a lot
(unless there is exstensive use of thinwalls). Eight wide trains are going to hit the
limits imposed by 9v before 6 wides. I realize that power is a function of both current
and voltage, but if the voltage isn't large enough the current cannot be pushed
through. Eight wide trains could reach the point where the voltage is not high enough
to push a current through and start the train.

Sometimes the technology does not become the standard, sometimes is the the technology
that gains the widest acceptance first that becomes the standard. Saying it another
way; change is a pain.

Chris

Tom Stangl wrote:

John Neal wrote:

I could live with larger pieces, as long as they are the *right* pieces;-)
Train fronts (split), nose shells, specialty items (fans), railings, new
trucks.  Let them accent play, give us the tools and we will accent the
modeling;-)

I've NEVER understood why Lego didn't make nose pieces split to begin with.  Then
they could make each half 2-wide, and you could insert slopes between them to make
them any width you want.  Then they'd only have to worry about making 6/8/10/12 wide
windshields for the different nose halves.

If I ever make an 8-wide, it's going to be in a common color, so I can cut <shudder>
2 6-wide nose slants apart to make an 8-wide nose.

--
| Tom Stangl, Technical Support          Netscape Communications Corp
|      Please do not associate my personal views with my employer



Message has 2 Replies:
  Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
 
Christopher Masi wrote: Yes, Mr Horshack? ;-) (...) No, they be heavy;-D But it's all relative. They are feathers compared to my 14 wides{:^D (...) I use 2 motors in my 8 wide engines. To tell the truth, I'd use 2 motors in 6 wides, too, because (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)
  Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
 
Christopher Masi <cmasi@cmasi.chem.tulane.edu> wrote in message news:38B42AE5.D23FB9...ane.edu... (...) anyone recall (...) weight a lot (...) to hit the (...) both current (...) pushed (...) high enough (...) the technology (...) it another (...) (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)  

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Future of LEGO Trains ? was Re: Model Railroad Scenery
 
(...) I've NEVER understood why Lego didn't make nose pieces split to begin with. Then they could make each half 2-wide, and you could insert slopes between them to make them any width you want. Then they'd only have to worry about making 6/8/10/12 (...) (25 years ago, 23-Feb-00, to lugnet.trains)  

85 Messages in This Thread:





























Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR