Subject:
|
Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 6 Apr 2005 17:55:31 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1331 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
| |
I don’t doubt that breasts have been long-time symbols of fertility and
motherhood, but the so-called “Venus cults” of prehistory are largely
products of speculation and presumption. It seems more likely that a figure
with 100 breasts is a symbol of nurturing motherhood than of scintillating,
hubba-hubba sexuality.
|
Hmm... Well, even if they were just motherhood totems,
this piece
of sculpture apparently had other connotations.
Those naughty, naughty prehistoric Germans!
Dave!
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) That piece by Morris has been widely questioned as relying too heavily post-hoc reasoning based on pre-determined gender roles, but I still enjoy a lot of his work. I don't doubt that breasts have been long-time symbols of fertility and (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
