Subject:
|
Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 22:46:34 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
686 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Dave Schuler wrote:
<snip>
> I didn't intend to be nit-picky, nor do I think your post was poorly worded.
> Let's just split the difference and blame DaveK's breasts. He's a Canadian,
> anyway.
You leave my Canadian teets alone!
<snip>
> Dave!
Dave K
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| (...) Hey, don't get all reasonable on me now! I can cut through my verbosity and sum it up this way: 1. I dispute the assertion that verbal instruction is generally sufficient to steer a recalcitrant child away from ultimately self-damaging (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
