To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 23186
23185  |  23187
Subject: 
Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 16:16:43 GMT
Viewed: 
402 times
  
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Larry Pieniazek wrote:
   In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Christopher L. Weeks wrote:

   P.S. As usual, I disagree with everything John Neal asserts, openly or through implication

Careful there, Chris... he’s been seen going around asserting that the sun rises in the east again.

   on this subject.

er, oops. Nevermind.

:-)

Now, a bit more on track, we’re not much on hitting our kids, and we didn’t, much, especially now that both of them are in double digits, it’s no longer appropriate at all, but I’m not totally following why *all* corporal punishment, in any form whatever, is bad.

We have horses. Is it ok to smack one on the rump to get it to move sideways when it’s in crossties and another horse needs to get by and it’s hogging the aisleway by standing diagonally?

You can’t reason with a horse.

  
That’s a way of getting its attention. The smack leaves no lasting mark, and it does affect the move.

We have cats. Is it ok to squirt one with a water bottle when it sharpens its claws on our leather sofa instead of the scratching post after it has been repeatedly admonished not to do that?


You can’t reason with a cat.

  
That’s a way of getting its attention. The squirt leaves no lasting mark, and it does affect the change in behaviour.

So if my child, say age 5,

You can reason with a child.

Parenthood can be very difficult. However, I can’t see how resorting to violence will give a parent anything other than short-term gain and long-term guilt.

Generally, violence is very seldom the answer to any problem.

Scott A (who made the mistake of putting “spanking” into a search engine)

   is screaming and throwing a tantrum in a public place for no good reason and it’s not feasible to remove him from the situation but the screaming HAS to stop (stipulate that for the sake of the argument) is a slap or a splash of water not an acceptable way of getting attention to the point where the message to discontinue the bad behaviour will be received?

Horses and cats are chattel. Children are not. But they are, nevertheless, our wards. Disallowing ALL corporal punishment seems to take a communication device away from parents.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
 
(...) You can, however, teach a horse. (...) You can, however, teach a cat (...) A 5 year old, as Larry mentioned, throwing a tantrum, as far as my personal experience goes, is pretty much unreasonable, and will either stop the tantrum when a) (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)

Message is in Reply To:
  Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
 
(...) Careful there, Chris... he's been seen going around asserting that the sun rises in the east again. (...) er, oops. Nevermind. :-) Now, a bit more on track, we're not much on hitting our kids, and we didn't, much, especially now that both of (...) (21 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)

88 Messages in This Thread:































Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR