Subject:
|
Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:27:56 GMT
|
Reply-To:
|
Frank Filz <ffilz-lists@^saynotospam^mindspring.com>
|
Viewed:
|
311 times
|
| |
|
|
> In our society, breasts are considered sexual parts (because they are). • We tend
> to be more modest about displaying our sexual parts.
Hmm, always? Does that mean that breastfeeding is sex? Hmm, I guess there
are some prudes in the world that would like to prevent kids from
breastfeeding. Certainly there are those who think it's wrong to do so in
public. Of course no one seems to mind toddlers who run around in their
birthday suit (or at least without their bottoms).
Frank
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| I have read some real nutters along these lines. (...) Yeah, some people think that this sexualization of children bunk starts here. (...) Sadly, some do. It makes light of respectful modesty or somesuch. My wife got into a conversation once with (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Laws need to be based on something (...) Of what value is freedom if nobody respects it? We don't have "absolute freedom" in this country (which is anarchy). If people aren't willing to respect others freedoms, the concept is moot. (...) In (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
