Subject:
|
Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:06:41 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
420 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.off-topic.debate, John Neal wrote:
> In lugnet.off-topic.debate, David Koudys wrote:
> > Insofar as at one time the female ankle was considered sexual 'cause that
> > was the part that was 'always covered up'. Making laws based on this type
> > of sexual arousing 'finnikyness' seems very much inappropriate. You have
> > women exposing their breasts in public places for one generation, and they
> > will not have the same sexual impact that they have in this age, just like
> > ankles.
>
> Correct, the bar will be raised, as it was from ankles to breasts. Next will
> be the sexualization of our youth (which has already begun). What all of
> this amounts to is the decay of civility-- an amoral route to anarchy.
>
> [JOHN]
So we pass laws to lower the hemline back to ankles?
There should be a difference between sex and, well, not sex. And this issue of
toplessness falls on the non-sex side, or at least it should, for there are
societies today that have no 'sexual appreciation' of the breast. The same
cannot be said abou the vagina or the penis.
Again, if women went topless, within 20 years this will be a moot point (1)
Dave K
1- sure there are 'fetishes' some people get turned on by ankles, bellybuttons,
elbows, fingers, toes, feet, whathaveyou, but the law must be framed to work for
all of society, not jsut for the very few with fetishes.
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Why Dave? Didn't you agree before that if no one was being harmed, the laws should not interfere? How would it harm you to happen upon a couple (or more, gasp!) having leisure sex in a park near your house? Chris (20 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Skin (was: Re: Once again, etc.)
|
| (...) Correct, the bar will be raised, as it was from ankles to breasts. Next will be the sexualization of our youth (which has already begun). What all of this amounts to is the decay of civility-- an amoral route to anarchy. JOHN (20 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, FTX)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
