Subject:
|
Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.off-topic.debate
|
Date:
|
Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:37:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
475 times
|
| |
|
|
Dave, I'm thinking that you are nit-picking by way of purposely failing to read
between the lines. If I'm wrong, then I must have communicated rather poorly.
If you take a minute to evaluate my notes and your response, and then think that
your inquiry is completely reasonable, I'll address your points.
Chris
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| (...) Hey, don't get all reasonable on me now! I can cut through my verbosity and sum it up this way: 1. I dispute the assertion that verbal instruction is generally sufficient to steer a recalcitrant child away from ultimately self-damaging (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Corporal punishment (was rah rah, canada!
|
| (...) With respect, it is seldom the case that "simply asking" will result in getting one's way. Why don't you ask your boss to double your salary and increase your benefits? Will you get your way? I grant you, throwing a tantrum probably won't (...) (20 years ago, 4-Feb-04, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
88 Messages in This Thread:
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
