 | | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) Yeah, seems like a fairly simple case of a personal dislike, motivated by I don't know what, but not really important to me. I use the web interface now as well, but if I ever switch back to a news reader I'll have my sig pre-defined for every (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
(...) though. (...) I am assuming that by 'low-sloped canopy' you mean the canopy that can be found on the X-Wing? The biggest problem with that is: A) The friction-attachment pieces on the back of the X-Wing's canopy B) The little midget-bumps that (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Pokemon (was: Harry Potter Lego Line)
|
|
(...) Hunh? (...) Oh, you just mean that you like the game boy game, right? Have you seen the show? Is the game just the same? For what age group do you think that Pokemon is appropriate? Chris (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) As an example, section five of the Discussion Group Terms and Conditions states that you won't post defamatory or profane (among other things) messages. If you look at the snippets from your note above, you may find three breaches of this (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
Maybe use the star wars low-sloped canopy for the front half, and the Slave I steep-sloped canopy piece for the back half? It might be a little blocky, though. Hmmm -s (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
(...) That would work, and it has been done, but not for an A-10 Warthog. The model it was done on is Thad Jantzi's F-16 Fighting Falcon. (It would also work on most other aircraft in the USAF inventory - The F-15, the F-14, the F-5's front piece..) (...) (24 years ago, 14-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
(...) Or you could take two of those canopies and put one facing forward and another backwards creating a bubble canopie. --kyle (URL)In lugnet.off-topic.debate, Marc Cook writes: (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) 1. As long as a signature is short (four lines or under is best), it doesn't really matter what the content is, as long as it's not offensive in a way that violates the charter of the newsgroup you are posting to. 2. It may not be important (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) Another example of why this cc'ing of people is such an obnoxious habit. It confuses and adds no value if you're a frequent reader of the groups. (I rail against it whenever I get a chance, I really wish people would stop doing it. It's a much (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) <snip> (...) I didn't miss it at all. That's what my reply to you was about. I then went on to state another, related point: I believe that short .sigs (regardless of content) are much less annoying than long ones. (...) Even if it's not (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | RE: This will get someone upset...
|
|
Hi Marc, (...) Actually I sent to you directly and CC'd lugnet.off-topic.deb...ugnet.com. Check your headers. I removed the others (lugnet.admin.terms@lugnet.com and lugnet.faq@lugnet.com) because I didn't feel it was appropriate. Being in Canada (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
I really thought about posting a reply earlier, but I decided against it. Here's goes second round. Marc, the problem is your own, over something, that is it really does bother you as much as you say it does, can be simply overlooked by not reading (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) I already said that I really doubt Lugnet would agree with me enough to do anything about it. (...) You're missing my point. I mentioned the part of signature files that really are uneccesary --- posting your job title and position. signature (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) I generally agree with Marc on this one. I don't think there's anything LUGNet can or should do to ban or even discourage this kind of thing, and as freedom of speech has already been mentioned in others' replies, I won't rehash that reasoning (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
This is just petty, IMO. Who really cares? (Besides you, obviously.) So it is another 4 lines on a message, JUST SKIP IT! Here is a quote for you: "Love it or leave it." And as far as the bandwith argument goes - God forbid that each message be one (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) I've read your post a couple of times, and I am frankly baffled. Why does this annoy you so much? It's a couple of lines at the end of a post that are incredibly easy to ignore. (...) Some people post to more places than LUGNET. They may not (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) Well, I use the web interface so currently (unless I get off my duff and find a macro solution) my sig is whatever I feel like typing by hand. But when I was posting via Netscape news, my sig was what I had configured it to be. Since I posted (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) While I don't include my position in posts from work, I do make it clear when I am posting from work. This is because I have my Netscape at work set up with my home e-mail identity, but I don't want to hide the fact that the post is (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
I'd build an A-10 out of light grey and use dark grey and black for the details. For a canopy I figure there is no perfect way to do one so I'd us the naboo fighter canopy and then make the back part of it slope into the fuselage, kinda like they (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) if you've got a proper newsreader, you ought to be able to turn off the display of signatures, assuming people use the proper dash dash space ("-- ") delimiter. that should prevent your being annoyed. (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) Points well taken Richard. There are several ways of looking at my comments. Here is a recent direct email I received from this post and my reply to this poor Canadian: ##### Dave Hylands wrote (me directly): Hi, Marc Cook wrote: > What I (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | RE: This will get someone upset...
|
|
Hi, (...) And some people, like me, just configure their email program to automatically include the signature. I read lugnet using email, not using news. I don't consider it "bragging", I just consider it professional when dealing with others. I (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: This will get someone upset...
|
|
(...) I don't disagree with you, but at the same time I think that people should be allowed to have whatever signature they want. I see it as a form of freedom of expression. I wouldn't want to stop people from posting with their chosen signatures (...) (24 years ago, 13-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | This will get someone upset...
|
|
I've noticed a few people like posting their signature files on Lugnet or a "signature" like saluation. I think degree posting a quote, or a link to your lego pages is fine. What I really see as bragging and I feel is really annoying is posting your (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.admin.terms, lugnet.faq)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
(...) cool -- problem is I don't have those pieces. I'll come up with something. Thanks for the link. - Marc (URL) [ UH-60 L ] (URL) [ UH-60 C ] (URL) [SEAL Team 9] (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
(...) (URL) - jsproat (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
(...) do, (...) ground- (...) I've have not heard this rumored replacement of the a-10 by the f16 falcon. I challenge the rumor and would like to see press release proof. Your comments jsproat are spoken like true A-10 lover. I'm closer to loving (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
| |
| | Rendering impossible to build models
|
|
(...) I am well aware of what POV can render. I have been modeling in POV for years, long before I discoved tools for creating dat files and converting them to POV. Although your models are very cool looking, They appear to not be buildable out of (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Harry Potter Lego Line
|
|
(...) Our minister recently did a service on Harry Potter. Her original intent was to counter the religious opposition, assuming that most religious conservatives were against the books. What she discovered was that while there was a vocal minority (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My Capital Ships! AT LONG LAST!!!!
|
|
(...) I seem to recall the pot having this same conversation with the kettle. Drew, I wasn't going to comment on your Harrier, and I especially wasn't going to say that it doesn't look "cool", but hey, I'm having a less-than-glorious day. Here's my (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
|
|
(...) They also come in light gray, dark gray, desert brown, black, and (I kid you not) I've seen one painted *red*. I'm guessing here, but they probably get them out of the factory in some grayish color, then paint them later... (...) Isn't this (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
(...) D'oh--Sorry, just a mistype! Though I could have spelled it "Picksburgh" and still been using a locally-accepted pronunciation! (...) On second thought, that's what I was doing--I didn't mistype it. 8^) (...) That is 100% correct! I live about (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
(...) that--mass. (...) Sheesh! Pittsburgh! Not Pittburgh! :-) I'll at least give you credit for creativity (usually people write Pittsburg, which is how the other Pittsburgs in Kansan, CA, TX and where ever else spell it). Sorry if you were making (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My Capital Ships! AT LONG LAST!!!!
|
|
(...) Thanks Shiri, I agree, what started as an ( intended ) simple reminder should be no cause for fighting over the network. -Joe US Marines- The World Is My Playground (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: My Capital Ships! AT LONG LAST!!!!
|
|
Uh, uh, ouch. Looks like you two should both take a deep breath and let it out... sloooowly... no reason for bashing each other, really. Mladen was giving some advice, it's easy to mistake a tone over the net. If you still insist - take it to (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Re - Realease Old Themes?
|
|
(...) Right on, brother. (...) Oh, and Dan Siskind (who is also a better designer than TLC... for adults) does? (...) Well, you just proved #1, not that it needed proving. :-) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Southern Pride ( was Re: wild west creations )
|
|
I'm sorry if I came off a little strong, I didn't really mean to. You're absolutly right, All southerners do not support the Confederacy, and that does not make them one bit less southern than the next person. I don't want to get into a debate on (...) (24 years ago, 10-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: wild west creations
|
|
(...) I was joking, but I don't think it would be a bad sub-theme. (...) and to some people the Confederate flag is a thing of pride. That's why they hang it in their front yards, and I doubt that there are any people (not to mention minifigs) that (...) (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 rumours
|
|
(...) I would rather see a rumor about DC and Lego as then maybe a wonder woman set would come out. Just think of all the clear plastic special pieces that might come in an "invisible jet" set. Matt (24 years ago, 9-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 rumours
|
|
(...) Yeah, I started those rumors. (: (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 rumours
|
|
(...) Snip (...) I hope that Lego won't licence everything. Lego is not about creating a model and letting it sit there (although that's what most AFOLs are doing, me included). Lego is about building, dismantling and rebuilding. Where goes the (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 rumours
|
|
(...) employs one. (...) spaceports (...) Obi Wan and Luke were trying to hire a *fast* ship that would be likely to stay away from official channels, as a spaceliner would likely have gotten them picked up by Imperial Customs. (...) That's a (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: 2001 rumours
|
|
"Erik Olson" <olsone@spamcop.net> wrote in message news:FxD8tx.M55@lugnet.com... (...) to (...) one. (...) spaceports (...) passenger (...) just (...) flying (...) Vader, who (...) dream (...) are (...) Wars (...) Thanks for the insight, Eric! I (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Mass transit (nee Age) Limitations
|
|
(...) Looks like we agree on that! I wasn't saying anything bad about cars. Mostly, that life in a big city is a chore. (...) I gotta hand that one to you. The most I've schlepped on the T was a suitcase and a computer and a monitor during rush hour (...) (24 years ago, 8-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) The only Best Buy I've checked is in the South Hills, though I've checked another bunch of stores throughout town and the North Hills. Best Buy had the best buys, but the selection wasn't as exhaustive as I'd've liked. I was grossly (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) Really, just a couple? Geez, it's going to take me 35-40 discs, just for the LPs. That's ignoring all the CDs I've got. But maybe you go for more compression than I do... (...) ... yep, definitely more compression ... (...) mp3.com is already (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) I think I did read something about CDs being marketed by about 5 or so companies, and the did have agreements in place to sell CDs at certain prices. Dave, have you been to a National Record Mart since you've been out here in Pittsburgh? CDs (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
"Mike Petrucelli" <lordinsanity@usa.net> wrote in message news:FxApBH.4Ix@lugnet.com... (...) doesn't (...) statement. (...) make (...) they'd (...) to the (...) a (...) their (...) the (...) is the (...) don't (...) peices at (...) a (...) studio, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) Because you like to hear your self talk remember... follow-ups to lugnet.off-topic.fun (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.off-topic.fun)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Sales in the 21st Century
|
|
(...) I think you might have cut too much away as I have no idea what you're getting on about. Referring to a post in what way? As flame bait? Mine. To baldly state what some people don't like to acknowledge is indeed flame bait (0). In this case (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Sales in the 21st Century
|
|
Larry Pieniazek <lpieniazek@mercator.com> wrote in message news:FxBDoK.IEy@lugnet.com... Which post are you referring to? Yours or his? Or both? If I see nothing from you but childish insults, I'll just ignore you and move on. If I see an argument I (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Mass transit (nee Age) Limitations
|
|
(...) Hit fire too soon, forgot to say "and that sucks, by the way... blue laws have the unintended consequence of keeping women unliberated..." although maybe it's NOT unintended... Laws are passed mostly by old men, after all, and if keeping (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Mass transit (nee Age) Limitations
|
|
(...) equal (...) week. (...) Yep. I like them as a tourist (and would as a commuter) but I'd never ever want to do grocery shopping the way US people do using them. Here in Zurich (and in Heidelberg per my cousin the PhD molecular geneticist who is (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Decision on Age limitation
|
|
(...) I think the meeting on Tuesday (which I am toying with trying to make, turns out it's hypothetically possible) will decide that. ++Lar (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
Your ability to completely miss points continues to amaze me! (...) took (...) Two things: 1. What does this have to do with the argument? yes, Windows may not be perfect, but it's what people use. The argument is that the government meddling is (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Bulk Sales in the 21st Century
|
|
(...) Well said Tom. I think it's hilarious when people say how much better their country is than the US because they get free X, and then whine about why everything costs more in their country or why businesses don't want to set up or expand (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.lego.direct, lugnet.general, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Mass transit (nee Age) Limitations
|
|
(...) Perhaps you misunderstood my point; I'm asserting that trolleys and the like *do not* equal the convenience of a car, and they likely never will. In fact, every week I do the grocery shopping for my family of two, lugging the bags the 1/4 mile (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Mass transit (nee Age) Limitations
|
|
(...) And one day you'll (maybe) be grocery shopping for a family of 4, and you'll think Wow, it would suck to have to carry all this on the trolley, every week. I'm a do-things-for-yourself kind of guy. Yet my NLSO thinks it's great when we can pay (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) Yes, those silly consumers don't know enough to make sure that their computer comes with a programming language, or kernel sources. As a result they can't fix things that are broken, and that makes it a sucky computer that they bought. Sheesh, (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Decision on Age limitation
|
|
(...) They will be having a discussion at their next meeting. Hopefully they will see this message and realize that it would be a good idea to start a new thread to say whatever they are going to say about the decision. Optionally, just watch (...) (24 years ago, 7-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) Oops. That should probably read "If I were selling something @ $10 per..." Dave! (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Decision on Age limitation
|
|
Was a decision ever made on changing NELUG's age limit? I don't have time to run through oer 200 messages, unfortunately. Paul Sinasohn LUGNET #115 (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) Worst in what way? Popularity? Identifiability? Public recognition? Its near-iconic status in the computer industry? My Windows usage primarily involves word processing, personal finance, the web, and low-key graphics applications. Since (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) You're misunderstanding the nature of collusion; you and I aren't colluding to post to Lugnet, but we're both doing it. Likewise the recording industry isn't conspiring to keep CD prices high, but prices are high nonetheless. (...) Sure it (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear mr lucas...
|
|
(...) I'm (...) any (...) one (...) ANY (...) the (...) is (...) "white" (...) Interesting. I have always (even as a child) thought of mini-figs as the inhabitants of Legoland. There are no humans in Legoland on Planet Lego or otherwise. They did (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) ROTFLMAO Windows is one of the worst programs to ever hit the PC. The fact that it took off is testament to the blatant stupidity of the average consumer. I would be more than willing to spend twice as much on an OS that is reliable. Oh wait, (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) That is what they are doing. Hence the artifical inflating prices statement. (...) simply (...) just (...) costs (...) CD (...) As i stated most artists make next to nothing off CD sales anyway. This is the reason most artists don't care, (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) That's approximately how I did my Christmas shopping this past year, but it wasn't anything like a convenience. Among my purchases were a 10 quart glass punch bowl, an armful of books, a CD player and several CD's. As such, I had to make about (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) I have no doubt that an effective mass transit system is possible, and in some regions even necessary, but in the (only) five cities where I've lived, mass transit couldn't compete against cars for convenience. I guess that's my thesis, in (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) I should correct myself. I personally don't consider Miami's MetroRail a waste of money. I'm actually a semi-fan of mass rail transit (subways, etc.). However, I'm not surprised that only 45,000 to 50,000 people ride this system in the largest (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear mr lucas...
|
|
(...) ->snip<- (...) ->snip<- (...) I posed the question to my son (who's now nine, but I think he was seven at the time). I pointed out that (almost) all Lego minifigs are yellow, but no one is actually bright yellow - did he think of them as a (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) Actually, to my knowledge, CDs were not designed by the record industry, they were designed by Philips, and they were not designed to hold just music, but that happened to be a good use for them. (...) I really don't see that the record (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Dear mr lucas...
|
|
(...) First off, the duplo-figs are different than the minifigs. They are not portrayed as yellow at all, only 'white' or 'black'. OTOH, there aren't any black *mini*figs. True, TLC created one (1! just one!) red minifig, but that was over 20 years (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: who's feelin the black pack?
|
|
Gerry and all, Well said, in terms of the race issue. I was making a sarcastic reply to the "black pack" when I referred to the "white pack". I am rather tired of the endless debates in terms of SW, TLG, and race, and that is where this comment came (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.starwars)
|
| |
| | (canceled)
|
|
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
(...) Mass transit can work for day-to-day useage if the places you want to go are convenient to the mass transit lines. In Boston they are. Part of this is that many of the buisiness districts were developed before the car, and therefore are along (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) I used to do a Christmastime shopping spree in Boston using the T. I would walk down to a bus station from my mom's house (a 5 minute walk), and then hit a bunch of stores all over Boston (and one out in Malden). My spree was not as efficient (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) I'm familiar with that Boston trolley history, but NY is a little different. The underground lines for the most part date from a 1900 city-financed project let out to a contractor. It was charted to serve Manhattan and the Bronx. Other (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) No, not exactly. More like it has to be driven by market forces. NY subway, arguably one of the best US ones (in terms of routes, connections and coverage possible), is a socialized amalgam of several competing subway lines that were built by (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
(...) "non-debating"?! You must have me confused with someone else--I nitpick **everything**! 8^) (...) Oh, I don't deny that the vehicles of mass transit are often very cool--I myself love to watch trainyards at work, and I'm not even a train (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
Hi non-debating Dave, I'm in New York, and I was a transportation junkie. I would enjoy standing on top of the "subway" elevated platform at Woodside in Queens, where it crosses over the Long Island Railroad tracks. One night, there I was, listening (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) I'm not unaware that you're calling down "the law". In fact, I'm pretty sure it already happened. I just don't have any respect for that ideology. You can call whatever you like "artificial" and get listeners. If you still think "profit" is (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Hitler minifig (Adventurers)
|
|
(...) I think this is an important point. In a class I took a few years back here at the U of Pittsburgh (History of the Holocaust), it was pointed out that Hitler's Nazis only had ~33% of the vote in 1933, when Hitler became part of the German (...) (24 years ago, 6-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) sorts (...) a (...) gobbledegook (...) not (...) ??? They can charge whatever they want as long as the entire industry doesn't collude to control those prices. Supply and demand. On CDs, the price was originally high because there were so few (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
(...) Believe me, after living in a city that has gone through the process of hosting the Olympics, it isn't that big of a thrill. Basicly you give over all rights to your city to the IOC for 3-4 years and let them do as they will. Sure you might (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
(...) Here in Houston the local politicians are concocting a really bone-head plan to start a light-rail system. They want to put it along our main street corridor from downtown, through our museum district and medical center to the Astrodome/ new (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
(...) This is certainly true--a related problem with mass transit involves the current impossibility of on-demand convenience; if I want to pick up a few groceries, I can hop in a car and be there and back in twenty-five minutes. If I'd try to take (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) So you're saying the public transportation needs to be in place before the city? Makes sense to me -- if a city-organism is in the mode of transporting by car, it makes little sense to for it to jump to public transportation mode, just because (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Hitler minifig (Adventurers)
|
|
(...) I take it you didn't bother to read down to where I point out my own "wacky" name. Lighten up, and kindly don't pull a quote out of context. Bruce SCHLICKBERND (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
Mass transit will have little hope of being effective until the real costs of transportation are directly allocated. Even then, it will still have a struggle since people are willing to shell out a lot of money even now for personal transportation (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Public transportation (was Re: Age limitations)
|
|
(...) that (...) The "great" MARTA (Metro Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority) is a excelent example of what Larry was talking about. This system was built by local goverment (city of Atlanta mainly) to be used by the Metro Atlanta area. That area is (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) Hey, I LIKE Brian Setzer, have for years... It's not my thesis that all artists with BS for initials make dreck, (or all Lugnetters, for that matter, (hi Bruce!)) just that I found it funny in this case. At least Britney's easy on the eyes. If (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) that (...) Well, if you want to turn this discussion way over to some other road, there are lots of things we (America) should make a major investment in, to include better public tranport, like lite rail. Others being alternative fuel/power (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) What about Brian Setzer and the semi-inimitible Bon Scott? 8^) Besides which, I don't think the charming Ms. Spears is any less talented than, say, Rick Astley or MC Hammer, both of whom were dubiously quite popular in a glowing testimonial of (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) More flamebait *grin*: Of course, in the US, we pour a lot of money into our car-oriented system (Look at the Big Dig in Boston, for example) effectively using public subsidies to undercut public transportation. No wonder most Americans prefer (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: guns vs. household cleaners vs. gamers (was Re: What do other parents do with Lego guns?)
|
|
(...) much (...) The primary use of a handgun is to shoot people. If you want to go hunting, it's a poor choice. Target practice? Yes, but that's not why handguns were invented. Ruger. Good choice. Very solid. I liked my Ruger much better than (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) Oh-so-true. I have enough music right now to last over 40 straight hours of music, and that's not counting the CDs I had before (but I don't listen to them so much anymore). Of course I hear much more than 40 hours straight at a time, with (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Star Wars on DVD
|
|
(...) complex (...) tenth (...) First, cite your .1 cent figure, please. Do you have access to TLC tooling and raw material costs? What's the burden rate or are they using fully allocated costing, and how much of the R&D budget is attributtable to (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
| |
| | Re: Age limitations
|
|
(...) Funny, in the US anyway, it seems that the public transit that works the best was built a long time ago by private companies, and the public transit built recently in cities that didn't have any doesn't usually work at all. Here in Zurich, the (...) (24 years ago, 5-Jul-00, to lugnet.org.us, lugnet.off-topic.debate)
|
