To LUGNET HomepageTo LUGNET News HomepageTo LUGNET Guide Homepage
 Help on Searching
 
Post new message to lugnet.off-topic.debateOpen lugnet.off-topic.debate in your NNTP NewsreaderTo LUGNET News Traffic PageSign In (Members)
 Off-Topic / Debate / 6000
5999  |  6001
Subject: 
Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
Newsgroups: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build
Followup-To: 
lugnet.off-topic.debate
Date: 
Tue, 11 Jul 2000 19:37:05 GMT
Reply-To: 
jsproat@io./SayNoToSpam/com
Viewed: 
2477 times
  
LegoMasterLuke wrote:
Another problem with building the A-10 is the color. Lego doesn't make the
drab green pieces required for the typical A-10's camoflauge. (And if they do,
the pieces in the quantity needed would be hard to come by.)

They also come in light gray, dark gray, desert brown, black, and (I kid you
not) I've seen one painted *red*.  I'm guessing here, but they probably get
them out of the factory in some grayish color, then paint them later...

You know the USAF is going to replace the A-10 with the more versatile F-16
Fighting Falcon? They say the A-10 is too slow, and thus vulnerable to ground-
to-air fire. :(

Isn't this where the A-10 really shines?  I mean, they are designed to soak up
all kinds of SA fire, and their primary targets are all ground-based.  Plus,
the feature list for the A-10 reads like a mafia boss' limo:  3-inch thick
titanium/glass canopy, triply-redundant hydraulic and wire-driven actuators
(plus free-falling landing gear in the rare case where all that fails),
fire-resistant and -extinguishing fuel tanks, a doubly-redundant engine system
that works even after you throw concrete through its fan blades, and of course
lots and lots of depleted uranium ammo and a cannon big enough and accurate
enough to deliver it.  Their hang-time without refueling is incredible, and is
usually at low enough altitudes to make stealth characteristics practically
unnecessary.  I don't remember the exact numbers, but the Nighthogs returned
from their Desert Storm missions with something like, lesse, *zero* losses and
a nearly-perfect mission record.

OTOH, the Fighting Falcon is primarily an air-to-ait interceptor platform
which is capable of delivering bombs.

I'd be very surprised if the USAF retired the A-10 in favor of the F-16.

Cheers,
- jsproat

[f-ups to .debate]

--
Jeremy H. Sproat <jsproat@io.com> ~~~ http://www.io.com/~jsproat/
Uh, two.  Including this one.



Message has 1 Reply:
  Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
 
(...) do, (...) ground- (...) I've have not heard this rumored replacement of the a-10 by the f16 falcon. I challenge the rumor and would like to see press release proof. Your comments jsproat are spoken like true A-10 lover. I'm closer to loving (...) (24 years ago, 12-Jul-00, to lugnet.off-topic.debate, lugnet.build, lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)

Message is in Reply To:
  Re: Building the A10 Thunderbolt "Warthog"
 
(...) The Fairchild A-10 Thunderbolt II's primary gun is the General Electric GAU- 8/A 30-mm cannon. And Mark is correct, it does have 7 barrels. The A- 10 "Warthog" is also capable of carring up to 15,950 lbs. of weapons. The aircraft's FAC load (...) (24 years ago, 11-Jul-00, to lugnet.build, lugnet.general)

70 Messages in This Thread:


















Entire Thread on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact

This Message and its Replies on One Page:
Nested:  All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:  All | Brief | Compact
    

Custom Search

©2005 LUGNET. All rights reserved. - hosted by steinbruch.info GbR