|
Josh Spaulding <josh_spaulding@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:FBL2Ar.J2D@lugnet.com...
> But this is why I've never understood why some people are so picky about set
> design. Sure, I love a well-designed set, too, but I just buy for parts.
I agree for the most part. I generally build the sets to get an
understanding of how some of the devices work. As an example, Lego has
changed the general steering mechanism in their models at least 4 or 5 times
since the old days of using 6 small turntables, and I always build new
vehicles to see what they are doing now. Its a learning device to
understand how to best use the parts (kind of like Lego school).
A well designed model makes the learning more enjoyable, and usually teachs
me layout tricks that I can remember and use on my own. I also keep all of
my Lego assembly guides so that I can go back and recall how they did
something if necessary. An example of this is set # 8858, which has a very
complex front suspension, and I have a hard time using the suspension pieces
in a similar fashion without referring at least once to the set's manual.
I would love it if the Lego manuals were more of a general idea book, kind
of like the Constructapedia in the Mindstorms set. I like to experiment
with small mechanical constructions, and don't really need to build the
complete sets for that.
alex
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: is anyone else finding...
|
| (...) In Jan. or Feb., I got myself a 5571 Big Damn Truck, and assembled it with my little brother, who was 8 at the time. We took turns - one would find the pieces while the other assembled, alternating at each step in the instructions. Actually, (...) (26 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
96 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|