| |
blisses@worldnet.att.net (Steve Bliss) writes:
> Bram Lambrecht <braml@juno.com> wrote:
> > The hinge bricks are a bit large
>
> Really? Considering what they do, they are a decent size. I don't
> think that plate-based hinges could deliver the 'clicking' function
> of these hinges. And they need to have (at least) a 1x2 footprint for
> stability. A 1x1 would wiggle around too much.
Good arguments, but I think they could have been two instead of three
plates high. The worst one though, is the hinge used for the X-wing
canopy. It could have been a plate, which would make it easier to place
things behind the pilot.
Don't get me wrong though, these are great sets! Even my mother noticed
that these sets "have little pieces again" (ie, no SPUDs). (She also
noticed the R2 wasn't quite as "cute" as in the movies)
> > and the rear landing gear on the X-wing >sucks
>
> Amen, brother.
It's easily improved though. If anyone comes up with a really nice
design for landing gear, please post it.
--Bram
Bram Lambrecht / o o \ BramL@juno.com
-------------------oooo-----(_)-----oooo-------------------
WWW: http://www.chuh.org/Students/Bram-Lambrecht/
-----------------------------------------------------------
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: is anyone else finding...
|
| (...) Really? Considering what they do, they are a decent size. I don't think that plate-based hinges could deliver the 'clicking' function of these hinges. And they need to have (at least) a 1x2 footprint for stability. A 1x1 would wiggle around (...) (25 years ago, 11-May-99, to lugnet.starwars, lugnet.general)
|
96 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
