Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 19:47:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1833 times
|
| |
|
|
On Mon, 1 Mar 1999 17:32:45 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@email.msn.com> wrote:
> That still wouldn't make it possible in Ldraw to (I)nsert a new piece,
> change the (P)art number, then type the part number of the part which is in
> your hand, and have it inserted. Multi-part parts are a problem, of course.
> But at least if you typed in the number for the bottom of the dinghy, you
> would get the bottom section of it (maybe with a comment giving the complete
> shortcut file) instead of nothing.
True, you wouldn't be able to use the related part numbers as parts, but
you could search for them (especially once some software uses the
KEYWORDS and CATEGORY meta-commands)
> I don't think we really need to worry about adding too many part files, as
> long as they don't gum up the description list when it is sorted by
> description.
That would be the problem. Are these real parts, or not? If not, how
are they flagged?
Steve
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) about (...) part (...) That still wouldn't make it possible in Ldraw to (I)nsert a new piece, change the (P)art number, then type the part number of the part which is in your hand, and have it inserted. Multi-part parts are a problem, of (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
