Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sun, 14 Mar 1999 22:46:13 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1334 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, onyx@flash.net (onyx) writes:
> [...] do we *care* about our catalog
> being a reference to TLG parts??? (i beleive we should use TLG numbers,
> but i mean all the different *versions* of the same old element) because
> you're correct.. we only need ONE 1x2 brick... color 16... [...]
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Agreed, except that in the case of the 1x2 brick -- there are two molds
still in use today: one with a post down the center and one without.
The one without the post is of course the one used for little windows --
like in trans-dark-blue in 6175 Crystal Explorer Sub.
It's important to me that the two versions of the 1x2 brick be
distinguishable in a DB for parts-auction purposes, but maybe not for CAD
building purposes. Still, I'd be bummed out if I couldn't run L3P on a
model and get the right type of 1x2 brick. :)
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) agreed again... my point being that TLG *may* use different element numbers to differentiate between certain parts in different colors (perhaps not 1x2 bricks) but that our concern should only be separate part numbers when the physical makeup (...) (25 years ago, 14-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) in all honesty, all i use LDraw for... to document my creations so that i have a record before i tear them apart... the only reason i model specific elements for the catalog is because i want/need them to document a RL model (well, sometimes (...) (25 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
