Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Fri, 26 Feb 1999 08:14:33 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1113 times
|
| |
|
|
In lugnet.cad.dev, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K) writes:
> We are facing a major problem in numbering parts in LDraw. For quite some time
> I have been trying to follow a 3 rule plan for numbering pieces:
> [...]
> The problem is, that some elements would force us to use numbers in seemingly
> un-intuitive ways. An example:
> [...]
> Some more problems from the current vote: (from Joshua Delahunty)
> [...]
> What to do?
> We need to resolve this as a group decision.
I am *SOOO* happy that Terry and Joshua (and others) are anal-retentive enough
and pedantic enough -- and thorough enough -- to bring this sort of thing up.
Just imagine what a mess it would all be if nobody cared...
This is really cool, guys!
--Todd
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) Well, to be honest, I just want to get a firm consensus on the best way to number these things. Something that will (hopefully) be agreable to the majority of users. Something I can use without greying too many more hairs. The real problem is (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Everyone, We are facing a major problem in numbering parts in LDraw. For quite some time I have been trying to follow a 3 rule plan for numbering pieces: 1. Full accuracy when possible 2. Use official TLG numbers if we have them 3. Use temporary (...) (25 years ago, 26-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
