Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 15:37:25 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1423 times
|
| |
|
|
Steve Bliss wrote in message <36daaf01.8075147@lugnet.com>...
> I think TLG's numbering always boils down to manufacturing and inventory
> control. A part number is needed for each molded part, so each subpart
> needs its own number. And the aggregate, post-gluing part needs a
> number to track its insertion into sets.
>
> Heck, the baggies of parts probably have their own numbers.
I'd say you're most certainly right here since their numbering system would
be for premarket tracking and not as we would use it in the post-market.
Does anyone know if TLG sells single part bundles, in which case, they would
need to track a single part or just set bundles?
Roy
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Sometimes I really can't understand the exact point that people want to come up with those type of conclusions, because, simply checking out the prior examples of same kind, which are already implemented with the ongoing system, just show the (...) (25 years ago, 4-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) I think TLG's numbering always boils down to manufacturing and inventory control. A part number is needed for each molded part, so each subpart needs its own number. And the aggregate, post-gluing part needs a number to track its insertion (...) (25 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
