Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 04:50:51 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1888 times
|
| |
|
|
On Fri, 5 Mar 1999 15:25:09 GMT, sparre@sys-323.risoe.dk (Jacob Sparre
Andersen) wrote:
> Terry K (legoverse@geocities.com) comments Karim's "30086.dat"
> and "30087.dat" in colour 16, and "4106548.dat" in yellow/yellow
> suggestion (which I support):
>
> > The problem with that solution is that we would then have the 4106548 hard
> > coded as yellow. And when the tan version is released are we then going to
> > have another 410xxxx for it - hard coded to tan?
>
> Yes. The problem is that this is a multi-mold part which is
> likely to appear in colour combinations as well as in a
> single colour.
>
> > This would lead us down the road to having multiple versions of parts.
> > I would prefer to have one basic version of the part, color being
> > user-selectable.
>
> What about just having "30086.dat" and "30087.dat" in colour
> 16 as the official parts, and then let people insert the two
> parts themselves.
>
> - the parts will always be listed next to each other.
> - the parts will always need the same location and
> orientation (hopefully).
>
> So it shouldn't be much more work to insert the two molds
> instead of the collected part.
For now, that would be a good solution. Of course, Steve would need to split
the pieces first.
> Whatever we do, we should apply the same rule to other
> multi-mold parts (such as the 2x2x5 girdered column).
>
>
> What was the final decision on the chrome antennae?
I finally just released it as 104.dat in color 16. A compromise of sorts. The
problem is, other pieces will (do) have the same problem. The fact is, many
pieces having 3xxxx or 7xxxx part numbers refer to that piece as a certain
color. Unlike the typical 4-digit numbers molded on pieces that refer to the
piece no matter what the color.
> There are four "dimensions" to our problem:
>
> 1) Single-mold or multi-mold part?
> 2) None, one, or more visible numbers? (more than one only
> applicable for multi-mold parts)
> 3) Know or don't know mold-numbers (equal to part numbers
> for single-mold parts)?
> 4) No known part number, know any-colour part number, or
> know colour-specific part numbers?
>
> Which have we decided how to handle until now?
Not sure I follow. Generally, LDraw parts have used molded part numbers.
Unknown numbers get a 3-digit or less temporary number.
If the part number is found, the temporary number is updated.
But many part numbers that have been found refer to the part in a specific
color - so to use that number, the piece _should_ be colored appropriately.
That would be following James Jessiman's vision of LDraw as a parts database.
But that would mean having some pieces hard-coded in their specific colors.
Something that many people object to. They want the ability to color a piece
as they see fit - whether it exists or not.
Perhaps a compromise and have pieces hard-coded under their actual number, and
a copy in #16 with a 3-digit number?
But many people object to the duplication of pieces and file bloat that would
cause.
> One thing everybody seems to want is that there should be a
> part file for each number parts appear with (visible).
> Whether it should be the part/mold the number belongs to or
> the one it seems to belong to to the "casual observer" is
> certainly something we still have to decide.
>
> Another thing we all seem to agree on is that there should
> be a file for every mold.
>
> Should we make files for multi-mold parts? (And which number
> should they have?)
>
>
> More later,
All hard questions. As pointed out to me, this program originally started out
as a way to document parts. Accuracy was important to James. And to carry on
his vision of the program would require us to add pieces numbered and colored
accurately.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) I'll look into it. The main problems are (1) I'm not sure it can be done without rewriting the existing code, which I don't *really* feel like doing. And (2) I'm not planning on cutting a dinghy open to see what the inside looks like. So any (...) (26 years ago, 8-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Terry K (legoverse@geocities.com) comments Karim's "30086.dat" and "30087.dat" in colour 16, and "4106548.dat" in yellow/yellow suggestion (which I support): (...) Yes. The problem is that this is a multi-mold part which is likely to appear in (...) (26 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
