Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:44:24 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1864 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 14:52:18 GMT, "onyx" <onyx@flash.net> wrote:
> Steve Bliss writes:
> > On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 04:58:22 GMT, "onyx" <onyx@flash.net> wrote:
> >
> > Just to be a pain: there are existing 'glued-together' parts in LDraw
> > with sub-files for each component part and a main short-cut file for the
> > whole thing. Two that spring to mind are the 2x2x11 pillar and the
> > classic 2x4 plate hinge.
> >
> > Steve
>
> hehe.. i can always count on you to be a pain, steve... :)
> every morning i come in here and check this thread and i can see everyone's
> point with equal value... i started in on this convo from the standpoint of "2
> #16 parts, then aggregate shortcuts for EVERY hard-coded color"... that appears
> to be where terry stands on it still...
True. As the best way to keep everyone at least somewhat happy.
> i think i can agree to that... my only caveat would be to try and avoid 3-digit
> numbers whenever possible (even though, as terry pointed out, there are still
> quite a few left to go around)... so if we can find aggregate numbers for
> combined shortcuts, let's use them as much as possible...
I don't want to over-use 3-digit numbers. Only where necessary and
unavoidable.
For instance; The complete yellow dinghy does have the correct number. So we
can make a shortcut for it (if we want too).
But, AFAIK, the pink dinghy does not have the correct number known. So I do
not intend to release a shortcut for that. That would be, in my view, an
avoidable use of a 3-digit number. If we find the number, and want the
shortcut, then fine, we can do it.
> once someone points out that this their impression of how "james would have
> wanted it"... all discussion stops as far as i'm concerned.
> so this is my last word on the subject... i say we do it according to terry's
> last post on this... he would know best, in my opinion.
I agree, it is hard to argue with the "How James..." argument.
All I want to do is try to keep both camps happy - or at least mollified.
-- Terry K --
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) hehe.. i can always count on you to be a pain, steve... :) every morning i come in here and check this thread and i can see everyone's point with equal value... i started in on this convo from the standpoint of "2 #16 parts, then aggregate (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
