Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 03:29:49 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1305 times
|
| |
|
|
onyx wrote in message ...
> let the possiblity of a large (but very accurately-numbered) element • library
> deter us from referencing parts as closely to TLG nomenclature as • possible... a
> bigger catalog just means we need bigger and better tools to • organize/search
> it... and we've got people doing just that...
Here you miss the point that some of us don't care a flip for TLG's
nomemclature. TLG has its own reason for using it that doesn't make any
sense for what we wish to use a numbering system for. Why should we have to
follow a system of indentification thats made to produce and market when we
want to easily find parts for a model or to enhance a discussion of building
a model. So, your right about, let's move forward. Let's think outside the
box. Let's find a new paradigm. Let's find some new cliches...........
Roy
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) i agree completely... i say we handle our parts/sub parts in the same way TLG does... if glued-parts have 2 separate numbers, then lets model both halves separately, then use any conglomerate numbers for complete elements.. if they are (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
