Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:36:04 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1825 times
|
| |
|
|
On Tue, 9 Mar 1999 23:34:48 GMT, legoverse@geocities.com (Terry K)
wrote:
> That is a possibility.
> Or, if placed in their own category, it would be possible to have LDAO not
> generate catalog images of them by excluding them in the INI file.
LDAO could be set up to ignore any unique marker in the descriptive
name. At this time, any user can do it themselves, by editing the
ldraw.ini. The default settings ignore moved files, 'delete me' files,
and light.dat.
> The important thing is, that for accuracy you could type in the filename and
> get the correct part. That would be better than just having a comment in the
> header somewhere.
I'm assuming we'll get more powerful search tools at some point.
Especially if the KEYWORDS and CATEGORY meta-statement ever take off.
With a reasonable search tool, having the number in a comment-line will
be as good as using the number as the filename.
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| Hi! Steve Bliss skrev i meddelandet <36e6742d.1574130@lu...et.com>... (...) will (...) Have You tried my search program? Version 3.4 of LDLIST is available for download at (URL) Summary: Ldlist is a little Windows program made for searching the (...) (26 years ago, 10-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) We could go that route, just have the two halves and no shortcut. The important thing is this would still be an accurate use of the numbers, but without carring it to the logical extreme and having the complete part. (...) True. Note that in (...) (26 years ago, 9-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
