Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Sat, 6 Mar 1999 11:28:45 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
1374 times
|
| |
|
|
onyx skrev i meddelandet ...
> bigger catalog just means we need bigger and better tools to • organize/search
> it... and we've got people doing just that...
>
> move FORWARD.
If we didn't have to have compatibility with the original programs,
LDRAW/LEDIT, the obvious step would be to make a database of all the
parts, which would mean more effective use of the hard disc, _and_
much more possibilities to search in unforeseen ways.
Of course, the database could be exported to separate files again...
Just thinking out loud...
--
Anders Isaksson, Sweden
BlockCAD: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/proglego.htm
Gallery: http://user.tninet.se/~hbh828t/gallery.htm
|
|
Message is in Reply To:
 | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) i agree completely... i say we handle our parts/sub parts in the same way TLG does... if glued-parts have 2 separate numbers, then lets model both halves separately, then use any conglomerate numbers for complete elements.. if they are (...) (25 years ago, 5-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
 
 
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|
