Subject:
|
Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
Newsgroups:
|
lugnet.cad.dev
|
Date:
|
Mon, 1 Mar 1999 15:19:58 GMT
|
Viewed:
|
2336 times
|
| |
| |
On Sat, 27 Feb 1999 19:59:24 GMT, "John VanZwieten"
<john_vanzwieten@msn.com> wrote:
> But it would be nice to at least have a .dat file for each known number of a
> part, even if it was only a "shortcut" file which referenced the original
> (preferably stuck at the end of the parts list when sorted by description).
> That way, as Ldraw parts become more of a standard for people talking about
> parts, they will be able to input whatever number is imprinted on their part
> and find get the ldraw picture of it.
Why don't we reference these part numbers as comments in the part-file,
perhaps on a 0 KEYWORDS line? Although that would be a headache to deal
with, making sure that all new parts get all the appropriate part
numbers...
Steve
|
|
Message has 1 Reply: | | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) about (...) part (...) That still wouldn't make it possible in Ldraw to (I)nsert a new piece, change the (P)art number, then type the part number of the part which is in your hand, and have it inserted. Multi-part parts are a problem, of (...) (26 years ago, 1-Mar-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
Message is in Reply To:
| | Re: Part Numbering Crisis in LDraw
|
| (...) method > for other parts - parts that may well come in many colors. Then, using that (...) I > would prefer to have one basic version of the part, color being > user-selectable. (...) But it would be nice to at least have a .dat file for each (...) (26 years ago, 27-Feb-99, to lugnet.cad.dev)
|
66 Messages in This Thread:
- Entire Thread on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
This Message and its Replies on One Page:
- Nested:
All | Brief | Compact | Dots
Linear:
All | Brief | Compact
|
|
|
|